irongaze: (Arbitrator | chatona)
Arbitrator Eliyen ([personal profile] irongaze) wrote in [community profile] tushanshu2017-05-09 11:28 am

video; backdated to May 8th

I have an important announcement.

The accusations made last week are serious ones, and we at the Guild of Justice and Arbitration would be remiss if we did not at least give them some weight.

I have asked Valdis to temporarily abdicate from her position as Chief of the KPD during this investigation, to which she has agreed.

For the good of the city, we all hope that the accusations are in fact as spurious as you have argued, and that this investigation will conclude quickly.

Thank you for your understanding.

[She is at least 80% sure that there will be little-to-no understanding.]
of_deduction: (21)

actual audio

[personal profile] of_deduction 2017-05-09 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh for god's sake.

[ There's absolutely no understanding in this corner because it's so obvious to him that that post was only meant to smear Valdis' name and cast unnecessary suspicion onto her. ]
looksfine: (pic#5546317)

video

[personal profile] looksfine 2017-05-10 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
[Aya did...not look pleased by this revelation, but at least she appeared calm. And still green, with no hint of blue. For now.]

I would like to request clarification on this matter: you have sought consequences against someone based solely on accusations made by an anonymous source? Do you not possess other evidence of their guilt?
looksfine: (pic#5546318)

video

[personal profile] looksfine 2017-05-12 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
But have you not already made a comment on it by informing us you are taking these accusations seriously?

[She was not attempting to pick a fight, but genuinely wanted to understand the difference between the initial announcement and any further elaboration.]

My concern is primarily regarding the current impression that you are willing to administer consequences without sufficient evidence that the accusations made are true. Would that not be dangerous if anyone could accuse an individual of a crime with minimal proof?
purrns: (🐾 It's all so simple now)

Video;

[personal profile] purrns 2017-05-12 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
[Yeah, no.]

Are you joking?! You're going to put her through all this because someone has gone on the network and given some rumours? Rumours without any proof? Rumours they admitted they had no proof for?

This is what you're basing your so-called justice system on?