solo_patria: (sc 5: my mistress is patria)
A. Enjolras ([personal profile] solo_patria) wrote in [community profile] tushanshu2013-09-14 03:52 am

Video:

[Hello, Turtle. Here is an Enjolras who looks a bit embarrassed that he's even started this late night/very early morning post, but well. The question he wants to ask IS actually a valid one, now that he has TIME to ask it, and he finds the current most popular phrases to be incredibly awkward or childish so..The hell with it. People have asked all sorts of questions here, haven't they? He's clearing his throat, flushing a little, then glancing into the vid directly and clearing his throat.]

A question, everyone.

I find that most of the current terms for one's...romantic friend...but more than such are either juvenile or not quite accurate. 'Boyfriend' for example, makes us sound as if we were children, 'Partner' has several connotations that do not immediately state the obvious and 'Lover' sounds particularly awkward.

[And well, they have not quite gotten to the lovers stage yet. Enjolras is hardly ready for it and still accustoming himself to the kissing and cuddling things that he never let himself seek out in life.]

When others here speak of the other piece of their soul as he is to me...what terms seem to work best for you?

[He will deny this video happened later. He really will. He just...really wishes to know and can't sleep so...here it is. Have fun with it?]
oathwalk: (as both worthy of general study)

video

[personal profile] oathwalk 2013-09-18 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
[He considers the point.] You specifically set the condition that enough people wish to see it changed. Do you mean to say that if the majority is content, you would not advocate it?

[It's not questioning Enjolras so much as seeking to understand how he approaches matters of injustice.]
oathwalk: (as both worthy of general study)

video:

[personal profile] oathwalk 2013-09-18 05:44 pm (UTC)(link)
[Richard considers what Enjolras has said. The minority must be protected, but all also must be heard and the majority must be respected. To sustain both of those, there is a logical conclusion.]

Do you hold, then, that certain rights are necessary, regardless of the opinions of the majority, that the minority may also be protected?