Spencer Reid (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
polyhistor) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
tushanshu2013-02-06 08:10 am
polyhistor) wrote in tushanshu2013-02-06 08:10 am
Entry tags:
- † agent north dakota,
- † albel nox,
- † alcuin nó delaunay,
- † ariadne,
- † arthur,
- † assorted characters,
- † astrid farnsworth (alt),
- † cassandra cain,
- † charles xavier,
- † clark kent,
- † combeferre,
- † damian wayne,
- † death the kid,
- † dominick cobb,
- † donnie darko,
- † enjolras,
- † jack frost,
- † jean prouvaire,
- † kon-el,
- † kyle rayner,
- † leonardo (2003),
- † oliver queen,
- † ororo munroe,
- † pepper potts,
- † stephanie brown,
- † tommy shepherd,
- † tony stark (mcu)
[video || cafe post || action?]
[Reid hates technology. No, he really, genuinely does. Computers don't move fast enough to keep up with him, and he has a long-established love of hard copies where literature is concerned. But the fact of the matter is, there are very few books here. So here he is, seated at a console, half a dozen of the local books he could find stacked beside him and several empty coffee cups as well. Recently, he's taken to drinking green tea, but a lapse in that particular habit seems appropriate considering his surroundings.]
You know, the terminology relating to a meta or 'multiverse' was originally coined by William James, a philosopher and psychologist in the late nineteen hundreds. His paper, titled 'Is Life Worth Living?' was published in the 1985 October Edition of the International Journal of Ethics. He postulated that, with the decline of social religion all 'visible' nature (that is to say, everything we see and experience) is in and of itself a 'moral' multiverse as opposed to being a moral 'universe'. He was referring to the visible nature of the world - good existing alongside evil, with every imaginable shade in between. Each nuance of the world then became in and of itself a 'multiverse' in James' ideal.
The neologism didn't actually enter into common vernacular until much later and under a drastically different context, but the concept of other worlds or parallel universes - what we today call a 'multiverse' - has actually been around for centuries, generally tied to religious philosophies of the time. Muslim theologian al-Ghazālī believed that it was not only possible but highly probable. His extrapolation was that that Earth was the best of all possible worlds and that humans occupied it as a form of divine right, stating that 'there is in possibility nothing more wondrous than what is'.
[a brief pause, because... he's generally not used to speaking so long without interruption.]
Essentially, the concept of a 'life, death or dreaming' state faintly echoes several Buddhist or Hindu philosophies, though equally suggestive of liminality. The continual repetition of that 'life/death/dreaming' theme represents a trinity; three is often considered a holy number in any number of doctrines. Three also represents the body (life), the soul (death) and the spirit (dreaming). And then, the fact that there are five districts also reinforces the ties to numerology. If you go by the numerical value of the Hebrew letter 'He' or 'five' it symbolizes the universal life, the breath of man, the air, the spirit and the soul.
Oh-- right, liminality. Liminality was another word coined in the same philosophical era as William James' 'multiverse' by Arnold Vann Gennep in his 1908 paper Rites de Passage. It's from the Latin līmen which means 'threshold' and it's a word used to describe the transitionary phase during a ritualistic transformation, during which the participant's own identity is considered to be void until the process is complete and the individual can be reborn. It's almost a contract – during this process you forsake your identity, your sense of self, your titles and earthly possessions all for the sake of a form of theoretical transcendental enlightenment. It's this fluidity of self that enables change and dissolution of old habits or customs to make way for the new. It's not limited to an individual, either; it can be applied to groups of people – such as a graduating highschool class – or to societies and cultures as a whole and I believe it's what we're technically undergoing now.
Liminality is considered a tripartite structure, and each segment of that structure is as follows: preliminal rites, or rites of separation. This stage involves a metaphorical 'death' undergone by the initiand. They're essentially forced to leave something behind by breaking away from previous practices and routines, or by, say, coming to Keeliai.
The liminal rites – or transitionary rites – involve the creation of a sort of... tabula rasa, a blank slate, through the removal of limits and forms previously taken for granted. There are two primary characteristics to this stage of the rite, first: the rite 'must follow a strictly prescribed sequence, where everybody knows what to do and how'. Because this rite is a fundamental deconstruction of the self and self-held values, it's meant quite literally to mirror the act of walking over a threshold between two worlds.
The postliminal rites, or 'rites of incorporation' are the third and final sequence. During this stage, the initiand is re-incorporated into society, essentially born again as a 'new' being.
[CRICKETS. CRICKETS ARE CHIRPING IN THE BACKGROUND, REID. He awkwardly clears his throat.]
All... right so... um, hi. I'm Doctor Spencer Reid. Any questions...?
[for those of you who didn't turn the console off ten seconds into his impromptu lecture??
ooc; also: a permissions post.]
You know, the terminology relating to a meta or 'multiverse' was originally coined by William James, a philosopher and psychologist in the late nineteen hundreds. His paper, titled 'Is Life Worth Living?' was published in the 1985 October Edition of the International Journal of Ethics. He postulated that, with the decline of social religion all 'visible' nature (that is to say, everything we see and experience) is in and of itself a 'moral' multiverse as opposed to being a moral 'universe'. He was referring to the visible nature of the world - good existing alongside evil, with every imaginable shade in between. Each nuance of the world then became in and of itself a 'multiverse' in James' ideal.
The neologism didn't actually enter into common vernacular until much later and under a drastically different context, but the concept of other worlds or parallel universes - what we today call a 'multiverse' - has actually been around for centuries, generally tied to religious philosophies of the time. Muslim theologian al-Ghazālī believed that it was not only possible but highly probable. His extrapolation was that that Earth was the best of all possible worlds and that humans occupied it as a form of divine right, stating that 'there is in possibility nothing more wondrous than what is'.
[a brief pause, because... he's generally not used to speaking so long without interruption.]
Essentially, the concept of a 'life, death or dreaming' state faintly echoes several Buddhist or Hindu philosophies, though equally suggestive of liminality. The continual repetition of that 'life/death/dreaming' theme represents a trinity; three is often considered a holy number in any number of doctrines. Three also represents the body (life), the soul (death) and the spirit (dreaming). And then, the fact that there are five districts also reinforces the ties to numerology. If you go by the numerical value of the Hebrew letter 'He' or 'five' it symbolizes the universal life, the breath of man, the air, the spirit and the soul.
Oh-- right, liminality. Liminality was another word coined in the same philosophical era as William James' 'multiverse' by Arnold Vann Gennep in his 1908 paper Rites de Passage. It's from the Latin līmen which means 'threshold' and it's a word used to describe the transitionary phase during a ritualistic transformation, during which the participant's own identity is considered to be void until the process is complete and the individual can be reborn. It's almost a contract – during this process you forsake your identity, your sense of self, your titles and earthly possessions all for the sake of a form of theoretical transcendental enlightenment. It's this fluidity of self that enables change and dissolution of old habits or customs to make way for the new. It's not limited to an individual, either; it can be applied to groups of people – such as a graduating highschool class – or to societies and cultures as a whole and I believe it's what we're technically undergoing now.
Liminality is considered a tripartite structure, and each segment of that structure is as follows: preliminal rites, or rites of separation. This stage involves a metaphorical 'death' undergone by the initiand. They're essentially forced to leave something behind by breaking away from previous practices and routines, or by, say, coming to Keeliai.
The liminal rites – or transitionary rites – involve the creation of a sort of... tabula rasa, a blank slate, through the removal of limits and forms previously taken for granted. There are two primary characteristics to this stage of the rite, first: the rite 'must follow a strictly prescribed sequence, where everybody knows what to do and how'. Because this rite is a fundamental deconstruction of the self and self-held values, it's meant quite literally to mirror the act of walking over a threshold between two worlds.
The postliminal rites, or 'rites of incorporation' are the third and final sequence. During this stage, the initiand is re-incorporated into society, essentially born again as a 'new' being.
[CRICKETS. CRICKETS ARE CHIRPING IN THE BACKGROUND, REID. He awkwardly clears his throat.]
All... right so... um, hi. I'm Doctor Spencer Reid. Any questions...?
[for those of you who didn't turn the console off ten seconds into his impromptu lecture??
ooc; also: a permissions post.]
Video
I am afraid neither name is familiar too me but I suppose I should explain that I am from the year nineteen sixty-two. You appear to be working off theories and material on subject matters that are currently in their infancy in my time, yet you speak of them with much more richness of depth and thought so I am suspecting you come from a point of time well beyond my own.
video
[And not a hint of condescension. After all, it's never the fault of a great mind when it happens to be born.]
I'm from 2012. Is there anything you'd like transcribed?
video
[How the hell do you think he's been entertaining himself on this turtle, Reid?]
And actually I meant Lehner. Turner I have read some of his, what would be for me, recent work in the field.
video
I mean more that it's going to be virtually impossible to obtain any actual cohesive academia here, at least as relative to Earth.
[And he's even up to date with the times-- well, for the era, anyway. Be still his nerdy heart.]
Lehner is a remarkable man. I've heard him speak, actually. He was doing lectures in late 2011 and I happened to be in the city at the time.
video
Provided all is well with my health, I will be close to eighty in 2011. Suppose I might still be trying to catch the odd lecture.
[As he says these words, it stirs up a cacophony of questions and doubts. Would he even be alive in 2011? Would Erik's vision of a world where mutants were hunted and experimented on, be their reality or would they find a way to integrate into society?
There was also the sad truth that his spinal injury would most likely impact the length of his life through complications with other ailments of old age at least. Shaking the thought off, he smiled at Reid.]
Eidetic memory, I assume?
video
He shies away from that train of thought in time to catch a shift in Charles' body language. There's something so natural about it that he's honestly not sure if he imagined it or not. He's never liked using computerized visual cues to judge cues.]
I-- hm? Oh, yes. It's not always infallible. The more time it's been since I read the original material, the harder it is to recall. There are books from my childhood I can only remember fragments of.
[... where 'childhood' equals 'three years old'.]
video
[Probably a product of his mutation and telepathy, some physical response to both manifesting in a more detailed conscious awareness of parts of the mind usually shut off to the awareness.]
Though, I will admit sometimes that is not always a good thing. The ability to forget is one of the conscious mind's most powerful tools in protecting the identity. Strip it away and you have to evolve new ways to handle the more negative events in one's life.
video
What sort of protection would the mind of a professor of genetics require? Every-day sorts of traumas? Distant parents, disagreements between friends or colleagues?]
I don't want to forget anything. I think it's... important. To remember things even if and when other people can't.
[He both loved and loathed what Dilaudid did to his mind.]